So far achieved are very promising
Results are better if the the patient is young, undergoes reasonable rehabiltation and the injury is not more then 1 yr old.
Results were beeter seen with intralesional transplantation of stem cells (upto 65 % patients showed improvement) as compared to only intrathecal/ Intavenous administration (35%).
What can be said beyond doubt procedural safety: No infection, dural leaks, Neuropathic pain or any Deterioration in neurological status.
Ongoing multicentric trial to validate the results further
We don’t believe in putting Testimonials —-further we request you to understand the science and don’t be carried by testimonials as these can be generated fake.
It is not a sham surgery/procedure. Spinal cord injury should be taken as terminal disease & the most promising intervention should be offered to such pts.
It’s impossible beforehand to give any prognosis and forecasts about the treatment outcomes with precise accuracy as in every case the patient’s dynamics is very individual so the complexity of the spinal cord functioning after injury.
Voluntary trunk muscle control:
Sitting without back support and able to stand with support is experienced by 85% of Patients with upper thoracic injury within 4 months.
Better coordination and walking ability with sensory improvement though motor scores did not improve much was observed in 90 % of patients.
Useful motor and sensory recovery:
Overall enhanced strength 65% improved muscle function and strength, including some ambulation seen in 60% Patients till about 2 years .
Bowel- and-bladder function improved in 55 % of patients.
Spasms induced by attempted movements diminishes significantly in 80 % of patients.
Electrophysiological measurements suggested improved nerve conduction through the injury site in 62%
MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) evaluations indicated increased spinal-cord diameter in 40 %
We can say up to 65% of ASIA A patients could recover certain motor functions, increased muscle strength, better stamina during physical exercises, pelvic organs functions and improved bladder control as well as the sensitivity to a certain extent, even though these results are very individual and we have to be very careful and give no promises. We can guarantee the only thing – that cell transfusions will not bring harm as none of our patients have experienced worsening of their state.
Intital Few Case reports:
25-year-old male who had sustained a thoracic injury 1 yr before treatment from a car accident. He received 3 stem-cell infusions at one month interval. After the second treatment, his coordination and walking ability improved. Reportedly, he regained function to the sacral S-1 level.
21-year-old woman with a T10 8 yrs before implantation. the patient regained ankle strength and control, including walking without caliper (only with crutches).
28 yr old post firearm thoracic injury—4 years before implantation-improved significant motor scores along with blader control after implantationof bone marrow derived stem cells and omentum traspostion.
55yr old cervical spine injury – 5 yrsold before transplation- had good motor recovery on day 2 but which did not last much . however he still has flickering movement in toes and better sensory scores.
A 25 yr old destitute with bed sores all over -1 yr old thoracic injury – after laminectomy –stem cells were injected –though does not have beeter motor scores but sensory scores improved along with able to sit and stand with support,can crwal. He is trying to take a few steps forward with walker.
28 yr complete injury after one injection had better significant improvement in crawling exercises (speed,stability and duration) walking abilities with walker and support.